<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Technology &#124; Security &#124; Software &#124; + More &#187; explicit.bing.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upcomingtechs.com/tag/explicitbingnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upcomingtechs.com</link>
	<description>- Unleash resources related to games, giveaways, freebies, tweaks, wordpress and technology news of all sort.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Google Vs Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2009/06/google-vs-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2009/06/google-vs-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raj Agrawal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Interesting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explicit.bing.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google vs bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upcomingtechs.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">Blocking Explicit Content</p>

It has always been a matter of concern regarding the easy access to explicit content on the internet. Google Safe Search filter does not really block all the potentially explicit content while browsing through. In fact, Safe Search is available for Images only. Even if search for the term "hot" with the filter set as "Use strict filtering (Filter both explicit text and explicit images)", the image


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2009/08/the-yahoo-bing-vs-google-story/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Yahoo-Bing Vs Google Story'>The Yahoo-Bing Vs Google Story</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2010/01/tricking-google-search-with-scroogle/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tricking Google Search With Scroogle'>Tricking Google Search With Scroogle</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2010/02/google-isp-offering-1-gbps-data-transfer-speed/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google ISP, Offering 1 Gbps Data Transfer Speed'>Google ISP, Offering 1 Gbps Data Transfer Speed</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Blocking Explicit Content</strong></p>
<p>It has always been a matter of concern regarding the easy access to explicit content on the internet. Google Safe Search filter does not really block all the potentially explicit content while browsing through. In fact, Safe Search is available for Images only. Even if search for the term &#8220;hot&#8221; with the filter set as &#8220;<em><label for="stf">Use strict filtering (Filter both explicit text and explicit images)&#8221;</label></em>, the image results will still return with content that won&#8217;t be suitable for minors. And not to forget the &#8220;Related search&#8221; suggestions.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.bing.com/" target="_blank">Bing</a> is proving a tough competitor to Google Search with it&#8217;s speed an better search results. Bing is strict on blocking explicit content for web searches and image searches too. Bing has a seperate invisible domain <em>explicit.bing.net</em> for allowing users to search explicit content. If you don&#8217;t want <em>user access</em> to it, just block <em>explicit.bing.net </em>the way you block any other objectionable site.</p>
<p>I am not being Anti-Google. It&#8217;s interesting how Google will answer to what Bing has done for blocking pornography.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3880/16294446341d7572d42o.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>It&#8217;s like Superman Vs Spiderman</em></p>
<blockquote><p>The <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06142009/business/fear_grips_google_174235.htm" target="_blank">New York Post</a> reports:But co-founder Sergey Brin is so rattled by the launch of Microsoft’s rival search engine that he has assembled a team of top engineers to work on urgent upgrades to his Web service, The Post has learned</p></blockquote>
<p>It was destined that Google Search had to face a tough competitor. Lets see how Google and Bing outsmart each other.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2009/08/the-yahoo-bing-vs-google-story/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Yahoo-Bing Vs Google Story'>The Yahoo-Bing Vs Google Story</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2010/01/tricking-google-search-with-scroogle/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tricking Google Search With Scroogle'>Tricking Google Search With Scroogle</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2010/02/google-isp-offering-1-gbps-data-transfer-speed/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google ISP, Offering 1 Gbps Data Transfer Speed'>Google ISP, Offering 1 Gbps Data Transfer Speed</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upcomingtechs.com/2009/06/google-vs-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
